Posts Tagged ‘Sender Policy Framework’

Action required for Group managers!: Change to DKIM-Signatures – domain alignment

Posted on: December 20th, 2024 by

Lately we have seen a few emails not being delivered to third parties and bounced emails with messages about failing DKIM signatures.

DKIM is a mechanism that allows a receiving party of emails to determine whether an email has indeed been sent by the party that is claimed to be the sender, thus protecting against forged sender email addresses. Kolab Now implemented DKIM signatures a long time ago, but so far we have always used the kolabnow.com domain as the sender domain, when sending an email from a custom domain. An example signature header would look like this (please note the ‘d= tag’):

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h=
content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
:subject:subject:from:from:date:date:mime-version:received
:received:received; s=dkim20240523; t=1734354313; x=1736168714;
bh=mBUfOmuiUe6nDmAiAsHAHqpD0F+Gd9nJUF5Z5spFd8I=; b=bVuQog18XlAx
+YG8FhYOSvrHhdAyr2PUb/24fINK1zlqDGQS56ULJp87ogvG0NBK7G4dNG94Nhnc
GIOtTwZX5+NDpOFcQ6hldkxU7thO1734fWHA6kL8CXKWZ35IWnyyf7/DAp1rPIhe
wUM9td8SwP+/SOibhOOLPKf4Zz9I3qygVvnzMBMFXb0bTQbpV45ASLk0RsG8Q+jP
RBFlRboeqE5mCEgrg3q0i3ip2bGkhqAGzUTmqi0ckTvXltm+nCFpVSKlRy+lgrXY
PQyaK97xt3pUHX9sdcJFHyIDldU/cSWCcTsrQobk5J0UPj8Dlh2RIma/06K9EEcl
Bx27XRIK4Q==

This used to be fine paired with our DMARC policy recommendation, but recently some parties in the email ecosystem have become more stringent, often ignoring the DMARC policy, and rejecting email that is not domain aligned.
Going forward, we are planning to adjust our DKIM-Signature so that it will use your sender domain for allignment. This means, that for a user ‘doe@kolab.org’ the signature would look something like this:

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolab.org; h=
content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
:subject:subject:from:from:date:date:mime-version:received
:received:received; s=dkim20240523; t=1734354313; x=1736168714;
bh=mBUfOmuiUe6nDmAiAsHAHqpD0F+Gd9nJUF5Z5spFd8I=; b=bVuQog18XlAx
+YG8FhYOSvrHhdAyr2PUb/24fINK1zlqDGQS56ULJp87ogvG0NBK7G4dNG94Nhnc
GIOtTwZX5+NDpOFcQ6hldkxU7thO1734fWHA6kL8CXKWZ35IWnyyf7/DAp1rPIhe
wUM9td8SwP+/SOibhOOLPKf4Zz9I3qygVvnzMBMFXb0bTQbpV45ASLk0RsG8Q+jP
RBFlRboeqE5mCEgrg3q0i3ip2bGkhqAGzUTmqi0ckTvXltm+nCFpVSKlRy+lgrXY
PQyaK97xt3pUHX9sdcJFHyIDldU/cSWCcTsrQobk5J0UPj8Dlh2RIma/06K9EEcl
Bx27XRIK4Q==

and so ensuring that all outgoing emails from this sender are domain aligned. However, this will require that the DKIM key is available on your domain in DNS. We recommend that group managers (the owners of private
domains) set the following CNAMEs (both of them) in the DNS of their private domain:

dkim1 CNAME dkim1.kolabnow.com.
dkim2 CNAME dkim2.kolabnow.com.

This will delegate the actual DKIM public key to be managed by the kolabnow.com domain, who in turn will align the key with the sending domain as mentioned above.

We will enable domain-aligned signatures in the end of January 2025, at which point DKIM validation will fail if these above (CNAME) records are not set.

Please keep an eye on this blog for news and updates. We hope this will improve email deliverability.

 

PS: Thank you to the users who reported the issue, and delivered content for our investigations. You know who you are.

Announcing Service Window: Updates to Kolab..

Posted on: July 29th, 2021 by

This Saturday, 31st of July 2021 at 08:00 UTC, the Kolab Now operations team will perform an update of the Kolab dashboard software on the Kolab Now platform.

> Continue Reading

Junk Email Filter.com is Junk

Posted on: October 16th, 2017 by

We’re dropping our use of junkemailfilter.com “Spam DNS Lists”, because we have few positive experiences with it. Frankly, it is Junk.

> Continue Reading

A Stricter DMARC Policy, Part II

Posted on: October 9th, 2017 by

Last month, we let you know a stricter DMARC policy was being applied to Kolab Now infrastructure. With a primary aim to increase our reputation and decrease phishing attempts from clearly false senders, we’ve since learned about some secondary effects;

> Continue Reading

A Stricter DMARC Policy

Posted on: September 26th, 2017 by

Sometimes, we receive reports that either our general reputation has declined to the point that certain receiving parties will block some of the email sent through our infrastructure, and that bothers us — because it bothers our customers. This usually involves just a limited number of messages, but is annoying nonetheless.

Other times we receive reports of phishing. These usually do not include verbiage that is suitable for repeating in this here blog, as the reports reply to messages do not originate from us, usually refer to external, third party sites but are most importantly also not submitted through our infrastructure. We follow up these occurrences with abuse reports to web server hosting companies, email providers and through other associated channels, but responses are often not thorough and not quick.

> Continue Reading